Free On-line Access

SPCI - Sociedade Portuguesa de Cuidados Intensivos

Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva

AMIB - Associação de Medicina Intensiva Brasileira

OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIAÇÃO BRASILEIRA DE MEDICINA INTENSIVA AND THE SOCIEDADE PORTUGUESA DE CUIDADOS INTENSIVOS

ISSN: 0103-507X
Online ISSN: 1982-4335

Ícone Fechar

How to Cite


 

Feitosa-Filho GS, Sena JP, Guimarães HP, Lopes RD. Hipotermia terapêutica pós-reanimação cardiorrespiratória: evidências e aspectos práticos. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2009;21(1):65-71

 

 

2009;21(1):65-71
Review Article

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-507X2009000100010

Therapeutical hypothermia after cardiopulmonary resuscitation: evidences and practical issues

Hipotermia terapêutica pós-reanimação cardiorrespiratória: evidências e aspectos práticos

Gilson Soares Feitosa-FilhoI, Joberto Pinheiro SenaII, Hélio Penna GuimarãesIII, Renato Delascio LopesIV

IPhD, Preceptor of the Residence in Internal Medicine and Cardiology of the Hospital Santa Izabel of the Santa Casa de Misericórdia da Bahia, Salvador (BA), Brazil
IIResident Cardiology Physician of the Hospital Santa Izabel - Santa Casa de Misericórdia da Bahia, Salvador (BA), Brazil
IIIPhysician from the Internal Medicine Discipline of the Universidade Federal de São Paulo-UNIFESP and Physician from the Research Division of the Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia, São Paulo (SP), Brazil
IVPhysician from the Internal Medicine Discipline of the Universidade Federal de São Paulo-UNIFESP, São Paulo (SP), Brazil and Fellow of the Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, USA

Submitted on June 16, 2008
Accepted on January 13, 2009

Corresponding author:

Gilson Soares Feitosa-Filho
Comissão de Ensino do Hospital Santa Izabel da Santa Casa de Misericórdia da Bahia
Praça Almeida Couto, 500, Nazaré
CEP: 40050-410 - Salvador (BA), Brazil
E-mail: gilsonfilho@cardiol.br

 

Abstract

Cardiac arrest survivors frequently suffer from ischemic brain injury associated with poor neurological outcome and death. Therapeutic hypothermia improves outcomes in comatose survivors after resuscitation from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Considering its formal recommendation as a therapy, post-return of spontaneous circulation after cardiac arrest, the objective of this study was to review the clinical aspects of therapeutic hypothermia. Non-systematic review of articles using the keywords "cardiac arrest, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, cooling, hypothermia, post resuscitation syndrome" in the Med-Line database was performed. References of these articles were also reviewed. Unconscious adult patients with spontaneous circulation after out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation or pulseless ventricular tachycardia should be cooled. Moreover, for any other rhythm or in the intra-hospital scenario, such cooling may also be beneficial. There are different ways of promoting hypothermia. The cooling system should be adjusted as soon as possible to the target temperature. Mild therapeutic hypothermia should be administered under close control, using neuromuscular blocking drugs to avoid shivering. The rewarming process should be slow, and reach 36º C, usually in no less then 8 hours. When temperature increases to more than 35º C, sedation, analgesia, and paralysis could be discontinued. The expected complications of hypothermia may be pneumonia, sepsis, cardiac arrhythmias, and coagulopathy. In spite of potential complications which require rigorous control, only six patients need to be treated to save one life.

Keywords: Hypothermia induced/adverse effects; Heart arrest/complications; Heart arrest/therapy; Cardiopulmonary resuscitation/complications; Cardiopulmonary resuscitation/therapy

 

 

INTRODUCTION

Therapeutic hypothermia (TH) is a controlled decrease of the patients' central temperature with pre-established therapeutic objectives. This treatment has been used for more than 50 years in cardiac surgeries(1) and more recently in neurological surgeries.(2) During the last six years this subject has gained momentum once again and has become one of the well established therapies after a cardiac arrest (CA) in adults.

During a CA, spontaneous circulation stops and vital organs perfusion is interrupted. Chest compressions, if well performed, provide a blood flow of up 30% in relation to the condition. Better perfusion of the vital organs will only take place after spontaneous circulation returns in patients successfully submitted to cardiorespiratory resuscitation (CRR) maneuvers. Main beneficial mechanisms of hypothermia for comatose patients recovered from CRR are shown in chart 1.

 

MAIN EVIDENCE FOUND IN MEDICAL LITERATURE

Patients admitted to the hospital after an out-of-hospital CA, in general, show a significant neurological anoxic injury and high mortality.(3) During the last 11 years various studies in experimental models have disclosed that neurological injury after overall severe anoxia is reduced when TH is applied.

The first of these studies, published by Bernard et al (4) in 1997, induced hypothermia (33º C) in 22 victims of out-of-hospital CA admitted to the emergency room. External cooling was performed and maintained for 12 hours in the intensive care unit (ICU). After comparison with historical control, an improved survival was noted for patients submitted to cooling (mortality of 45% versus 77% in groups without TH), with no significant adverse effects related to TH. Next, various publications disclosed the feasibility and safety of TH, in addition to improved neurological outcome, and a suggestion of lower mortality in the group treated with TH.(4-13)

Two large clinical trials were published in the same edition of the New England Journal of Medicine, 2002, on this subject.(5,6) Both showed the beneficial effects of hypothermia on neurological outcomes - one showed a significant decrease of mortality, leading the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) to publish guidelines in July 2003.(14) They recommended use of TH (32º C to 34º C) for unconscious patients after out-of-hospital CA, during 12 to 24 hours when the initial rhythm of CA was ventricular fibrillation (VF) and suggested that presumably this technique would be also beneficial for other CA rhythms and for intra-hospital CA.

An Australian study by Stephen Bernard et al.(5) was developed in four emergency departments in Melbourne. Patients of the study were comatose survivors of out-of-hospital VF. Exclusion criteria were less than 18 years of age, less than 50 year old women (due to possible pregnancy), cardiogenic shock (defined as systolic arterial pressure under 90mmHg after return of circulation) and possible causes of trauma other than CA itself (for instance, head injury, drug overdose or stroke).

Randomization divided this population into two groups: that of conventional treatment and that of induction to hypothermia. Ice packs were applied to those of the latter group to foster temperature decrease, already at the site of out-of-hospital care. Upon arrival at the hospital, measures for hypothermia were intensified. All patients were submitted to laboratory tests and to mechanical ventilation, in addition to correction of possible hemodynamic instability. After neurological evaluation they were sedated with midazolam and given vecuronium for neuromuscular blockade. Therapy with thrombolytics or heparin was used according to requirements. All were given aspirin and arterial pressure, arterial blood gases (corrected for temperature), glycemia and serum potassium were constantly monitored. The central reference temperature measurement was the tympanic until a Swan-Ganz catheter was introduced. Ice packs were removed when the central temperature reached 33º C. Temperature was maintained for 12 hours, with the patient always sedated and paralyzed. After the 18th hour, patients were rewarmed with a blanket with hot air for the next 6 hours.

A good neurological outcome (understood by the authors as discharge to home or rehabilitation physiotherapy) was achieved by 49% of patients. Among patients submitted to normothermia, 26% had a good outcome when the same criteria are used. After adjustments for age and time of CA, the odds ratio for good outcome in the group with hypothermia, when compared to the group with normothermia, was rather significant: 5.25 with p=0.011. There was no difference in the frequency of adverse events, although in the hypothermia group there was, on an average, more vascular systemic resistance, a lower cardiac index and higher glycemias.

An important multicentric European study,(6) developed in nine centers of five European countries, included patients victims of VF or pulseless ventricular tachycardia (VT) with ages ranging from 18 to 75 years(6). Patients that had some probable non-cardiac cause for CA, in addition to patients who stayed more than 15 minutes without basic life support or patients who took more than 60 minutes for the return of spontaneous circulation were excluded. Patients who reached the emergency room already with a very low temperature (tympanic temperature less than 30º C), pregnancy, comatose state even before CA, responsive to verbal orders after return of spontaneous circulation, evidence of hypotension, hypoxemia, pre-existing coagulopathy or terminal disease were also excluded from the study. The primary outcome of this study was neurological assessment six months after CA. Patients were ranked according to the Pittsburgh cerebral performance categories: 1 (good recovery), 2 (moderate disability), 3 (severe disability), 4 (vegetative state) and 5 (death).

Of the patients who received therapeutic hypothermia, 55% were classified as 1 or 2 after six months of the event, when compared to 39% of those with conventional treatment, a statistically significant difference. Mortality at six months was of 41% in the hypothermia group, significantly lower than the 55% of the normothermia group. In this study, contrary to what might be expected, complication rates that could result from therapeutic hypothermia did not differ between the two groups.

 

WHEN HYPOTERMIA SHOULD BE INDICATED?

The ILCOR guidelines recommend that TH should be performed in every adult patient that remains unconscious after recovering from a CPR due to a outof-hospital VF. They must be cooled up to 32 to 34º C for 12 to 24 hours. This technique would be also beneficial for other CA rhythms and for intra-hospital CA.

This treatment strategy seems to be quite efficient and only 6 patients need to be treated to save one life, that is to say a number needed to treat (NNT) of 6. Therefore there is no reason not to use this therapy as a routine.

TH should not be performed on patients under cardiac shock, after return of spontaneous circulation or in patients with primary coagulopathy or pregnant women. Thrombolytic therapy is not a contraindication for performance of TH and it is important to mention this because coronary diseases are the basic cause of many of the CA attended.(15,16)

 

HOW TO COOL THE PATIENT?

There are various tested cooling techniques: ice packs, extracorporeal circulation, iced infusions in the carotid artery, cape containing quite iced solutions (-30ºC), nasal lavage, gastric lavage, bladder lavage, peritoneal lavage, pleural lavage, cooling catheters, infusion of iced liquids, blanket with circulating cold air among others.(17-21) Ideal cooling procedures must quickly and practically reach the target temperature, without causing injuries.

One of the techniques for rapid temperature decrease is immersion in ice water that reduces about 9.7ºC per hour, on the average, however this strategy is not very practical for routine use, An even faster decrease may be achieved, if it is possible to keep this ice water circulating and in contact with the patient's skin. Extracorporeal circulation is also one of the methods of quickly reaching the target temperature,(17) however it is a highly invasive and unpractical treatment.

A promising method uses an intravascular catheter capable of cooling blood by means of an internal circuit permitting circulation of iced liquid and constant temperature exchange with the blood, reducing central temperature about 1.4ºC per hour.(18) Application of ice packs has proven efficient, reducing on the average 0.9º C per hour of application.(19)

Probably, the most practical and agile method is intravenous infusion of iced fluid (at 4ºC). Rajek et al.(20) administered iced saline solution (4ºC) to volunteers at a speed of 40 mL/kg, 30 minutes by means of central catheter and it was possible to safely achieve a 5ºC reduction of central temperature per hour. Bernard et al.(21) cooled patients who returned to spontaneous circulation by using Ringer lactate at 4ºC in an infusion of 30mL/kg for 30 minutes, achieving a temperature decrease at an average speed of 3.2ºC per hour, also in a safe way. Infusion of iced liquid, probably is the most promising, as it is fast, practical, safe and low cost.

Some topics related to cooling must still be defined and future studies are required to answer them. Perhaps cooling measures should begin already during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) or only after return of spontaneous circulation? At what ideal temperature should the patient be kept? For how long should patients, ideally, be maintained cooled to achieve maximum benefits with minimum risk? Which is the quickest form of cooling that is safe? At what speed should patients be rewarmed?

 

HOW TO REWARM THEM?

The ideal temperature for maintenance of therapeutic hypothermia in patients who recovered spontaneous circulation is unknown. ILCOR recommendations follow the first two main works: from 12 to 24 hours. Rewarming may be passive (about 0.5ºC per hour) or active (using a thermal blanket for approximately 1ºC per hour). Eventually, a slightly warmed saline solution infusion may be called for.(22) Maybe patients who are able to reach the target temperature more quickly and soon after CA require less time of hypothermia, however this hypothesis has to be conveniently studied.

 

MONITORING OF CENTRAL TEMPERATURE

The ideal temperature measurement would be measuring the cerebral intraventricular temperature, which is unfeasible in post-CA patients. Studies have shown that there are no significant differences between jugular vein, subdural, tympanic membrane, pulmonary artery temperatures and bladder temperature. Rectal temperature is inferior for monitoring of central temperature. Axillary temperature cannot be used under any circumstances as a parameter to decide for cooling or warming.

The two largest studies on TH post-CA, at some point of monitoring, used tympanic and bladder temperature.(5,6) For this reason, together with esophageal temperature, they are the more often used monitoring modalities.

 

LATEST EVIDENCES

In the scenario of intensive care medicine, a prospective study by Storm C. et al.(23) assessed 52 patients, with a mean age of 62 years, submitted to hypothermia after return of spontaneous circulation post-CA; their data were compared to a historical cohort (n=74) treated before formal recommendation of use of hypothermia. The group submitted to hypothermia had a significantly shorter length of stay in the ICU and of time on mechanical ventilation as well as better neurological outcome in up to one year.

 

CONCLUSION

The evidence shows a benefit of using TH for recovery of post-CA patients. Most studies were carried out in patient survivors of out-of-hospital VF/VT, that is why at this rhythm of CA therapeutic hypothermia is definitely indicated. In patients victims of CA at other rhythms or intra-hospital CA, the same amount of data is not available on application of TH. Therefore we are not able to assertively state the benefit of this therapy for these subgroups. Nevertheless, there is a theoretical rationale and a few short works that lead us to suppose that TH may be also useful at other rhythms or in victims of intrahospital CA.

The units must establish a protocol of induced hypothermia to optimize treatment for this profile of patients, for instance that available in chart 2.

 

REFERÊNCIAS

1. Cook DJ. Changing temperature management for cardio-pulmonary bypass. Anesth Analg. 1999;88(6):1254-71.

2. Hindman BJ, Todd MM, Gelb AW, Loftus CM, Craen RA, Schubert A, et al. Mild hypothermia as a protective therapy during intracranial aneurysm surgery: a randomized prospective pilot trial. Neurosurgery. 1999;44(1):2332; discussion 32-3.

3. Edgren E, Hedstrand U, Kelsey S, Sutton-Tyrrell K, Safar P. Assessment of neurological prognosisof comatose survivorsof cardiac arrest. BRCT I Study Group. Lancet. 1994;343(8905):1055-9. Comment in: Lancet. 1994;343(8905):1052-3.

4. Bernard SA, Jones BM, Horne MK. Clinical trial of induced hypothermia in comatose survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Ann Emerg Med. 1997;30(2):146-53.

5. Bernard SA, Gray TW, Buist MD, Jones BM, Silvester W, Gutteridge G, Smith K. Treatment of comatose survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with induced hypothermia. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(8):557-63. Comment in: N Engl J Med. 2002;346(8):546. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(8):612-3. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(1):63-5; author reply 63-5. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(1):63-5; author reply 63-5. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(1):63-5; author reply 63-5.

6. Hypothermia after Cardiac Arrest Study Group. Mild therapeutic hypothermia to improve the neurologic outcome after cardiac arrest. New Engl J Med. 2002;346(8):549-56. Erratum in: N Engl J Med. 2002;346(22):1756. Comment in: ACP J Club. 2002;137(2):46. Evid Based Nurs. 2002t;5(4):111. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(8):546. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(1):63-5; author reply 63-5. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(1):63-5; author reply 63-5.

7. Bernard SA, MacC Jones B, Buist M. Experience with prolonged induced hypothermia in severe head injury. Crit Care. 1999;3(6):167-72.

8. Colburne F, Li H, Buchan AM. Indefatigable CA1 sector neuroprotection with mild hypothermia induced 6 hours after severe forebrain ischemia in rats. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1999;19(7):742-9.

9. Hicks SD, DeFranco DB, Callaway CW. Hypothermia during reperfusion after asphyxial cardiac arrest improves functional recovery and selectively alters stress-induced protein expression. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2000;20(3):520-30.

10. Hickey RW, Ferimer H, Alexander HL, Garman RH, Callaway CW, Hicks S, et al. Delayed, spontaneous hypothermia reduces neuronal damage after asphyxial cardiac arrest in rats. Crit Care Med. 2000;28(10):3511-6.

11. Sanada T, Ueki M, Tokudome M, Okamura T, Nishiki S, Niimura A, et al. [Recovery from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest after mild hypothermia: report of two cases]. Masui. 1998;47(6):742-5. Japanese.

12. Yanagawa Y, Ishihara S, Norio H, Takino M, Kawakami M, Takasu A, et al. Preliminary clinical outcome study of mild resuscitative hypothermia after out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest. Resuscitation. 1998;39(1-2):61-6.

13. Zeiner A, Holzer M, Sterz F, Behringer W, Schörkhuber W, Müllner M, et al. Mild resuscitative hypothermia to improve neurological outcome after cardiac arrest. A clinical feasibility trial. Hypothermia after Cardiac Arrest (HACA) Study Group. Stroke. 2000;31(1):86-94.

14. Nolan JP, Morley PT, Vanden Hoek TL, Hickey RW, Kloeck WG, Billi J, Böttiger BW, Morley PT, Nolan JP, Okada K, Reyes C, Shuster M, Steen PA, Weil MH, Wenzel V, Hickey RW, Carli P, Vanden Hoek TL, Atkins D; International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation. Therapeutic hypothermia after cardiac arrest: an advisory statement by the advanced life support task force of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation. Circulation. 2003;108(1):118-21.

15. Varon J, Acosta P. Therapeutic hypothermia: past, present, and future. Chest. 2008;133(5):1267-74.

16. Sunde K, Pytte M, Jacobsen D, Mangschau A, Jensen LP, Smedsrud C, et al. Implementation of a standardised treatment protocol for post resuscitation care after out-ofhospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2007;73(1):29-39.

17. Nagao K, Hayashi N, Kanmatsuse K, Arima K, Ohtsuki J, Kikushima K, Watanabe I. Cardiopulmonary cerebral resuscitation using emergency cardiopulmonary bypass, coronary reperfusion therapy and mild hypothermia in patients with cardiac arrest outside the hospital. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;36(3):776-83.

18. Schmutzhard E, Engelhardt K, Beer R, Brössner G, Pfausler B, Spiss H, et al. Safety and efficacy of a novel intravascular cooling device to control body temperature in neurologic intensive care patients: a prospective pilot study. Crit Care Med. 2002;30(11):2481-8. Comment in: Crit Care Med. 2002;30(11):2598-600.

19. Felberg RA, Krieger DW, Chuang R, Persse DE, Burgin WS, Hickenbottom SL, et al. Hypothermia after cardiac arrest: feasibility and safety of an external cooling protocol. Circulation. 2001;104(15):1799-804.

20. Rajek A, Greif R, Sessler DI, Baumgardner J, Laciny S, Bastanmehr H. Core cooling by central venous infusion of ice-cold (4 degrees C and 20 degrees C) fluid: isolation of core and peripheral thermal compartments. Anesthesiology. 2000;93(3):629-37.

21. Bernard S, Buist M, Monteiro O, Smith K. Induced hypothermia using large volume, ice-cold intravenous fluid in comatose survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a preliminary report. Resuscitation. 2003;56(1):9-13.

22. Aoki A, Mori K, Maeda M. Adequate cerebral perfusion pressure during rewarming to prevent ischemic deterioration after therapeutic hypothermia. Neurol Res. 2002;24(3):271-80.

23. Storm C, Steffen I, Schefold JC, Krueger A, Oppert M, Jörres A, Hasper D. Mild therapeutic hypothermia shortens intensive care unit stay of survivors after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest compared to historical controls. Crit Care. 2008;12(3):R78 .

24. Wong KC. Physiology and pharmacology of hypothermia. West J Med. 1983;138(2):227-32.

25. Machida S, Ohta S, Itoh N, Maeda Y, Moriyama Y. [Changes in tissue distribution of potassium during simple hypothermia]. Kyobu Geka.1977;30(5):413-8. Japanese.

26. Ginsberg MD, Sternau LL, Globus MY, Dietrich WD, Busto R. Therapeutic modulation of brain temperature: relevance to ischemic brain injury. Cerebrovasc Brain Metab Rev. 1992;4(3):189-225

 

 

Received from Hospital Santa Izabel - Santa Casa de Misericórdia da Bahia - Salvador (BA), Brazil.

 

 

Submission On-line

Indexed in

Scopus

SciELO

LILACS

Associação de Medicina Intensiva Brasileira - AMIB

Rua Arminda nº 93 - 7º andar - Vila Olímpia - São Paulo, SP, Brasil - Tel./Fax: (55 11) 5089-2642 | e-mail: rbti.artigos@amib.org.br

GN1 - Systems and Publications